The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) recently announced changes to its supervision rule which requires firms to conduct background checks on applicants for registration. The background checks cover both first-time registrants as well as transfers, and are meant to ensure the accuracy and completeness of information contained in an individual’s Form U4. Information contained in the U4 forms the basis of publicly available information of all registered persons which is accessible on the BrokerCheck website. The rule changes, which have been approved by FINRA’s Board of Governors, require further approval from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) before taking effect. Under the rule change, a firm would be required to adopt written procedures for verifying an applicant’s information including conducting public records searches for bankruptcies, judgments, liens, civil litigations and criminal records. The rule change is the most recent effort by FINRA for additional disclosure by registered representatives. FINRA recently submitted a proposed rule to the SEC requiring registered representatives to disclose financial incentives such as “upfront payments” and “potential future payments” exceeding $100,000 when moving from one firm to another.
Representing financial professionals, financial institutions and investors in investment loss, employment and disclosure matters, and in regulatory investigations nationwide.
FINRA Approves Supervision Rule Change Requiring Enhanced Review of Applicant Backgrounds
On Behalf of Lewitas Hyman PC | Jun 10, 2014 | Financial News, FINRA Compliance
Recent Posts
- FINRA arbitrators allow Merrill Lynch broker to clear erroneous client complaint from record
- UBS ordered to pay $1 million to fired advisor who filed wrongful termination claim
- Federal Reserve lifts asset cap on Wells Fargo imposed in 2018 enforcement action
- AAG Capital penalized over failures to consider disadvantages of annuity exchanges
- Bar association for investor attorneys criticizes FINRA revisions to arbitrator qualifications
Archives
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- February 2021
- August 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- July 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014